Design System Problems

Design Token Documentation

January 15, 2026 • 5 min read

Design Token Documentation

Design token documentation transforms abstract token definitions into actionable guidance that teams can apply consistently. Without documentation, tokens become opaque references that developers must decode through trial and error. Effective documentation explains not just what tokens contain but when and how to use them, accelerating adoption and reducing misuse.

What Is Design Token Documentation

Design token documentation encompasses all written guidance about a token system, including token catalogs that list available tokens, usage guidelines that explain when to use each token, visual examples showing tokens in context, and technical references for integration.

Documentation serves different audiences with different needs. Designers need to understand the design rationale and visual relationships. Developers need integration details and API references. Both need clarity on which tokens to use for common scenarios.

How Design Token Documentation Works

Comprehensive token documentation operates at multiple levels.

Reference documentation provides exhaustive listings of all available tokens. This includes token names, values, types, and any metadata like deprecation status. Reference docs are often generated automatically from token source files to ensure accuracy:

Token: color.background.primary
Type: color
Value: #ffffff (light) | #1a1a1a (dark)
Description: Primary surface background for content areas

Usage documentation explains how to apply tokens to accomplish design goals. Rather than listing tokens, usage docs address scenarios: “To style a card component, use color.background.surface for the background and color.border.default for the border.”

Visual documentation shows tokens in context. Color palettes displayed as swatches, typography scales rendered as specimen text, and spacing values demonstrated with visual markers all help users understand tokens at a glance.

Integration documentation covers technical implementation. This includes installation instructions, import patterns, platform-specific considerations, and code examples for different frameworks.

Documentation platforms vary from custom-built sites to tools like Storybook, Zeroheight, or Supernova that provide token documentation features. The best platform depends on existing tooling and documentation needs.

Key Considerations

Common Questions

How should token documentation be organized?

Organization should support how users search for information. Most users arrive with a task: they need a color for something, spacing for a layout, or typography for a heading. Task-oriented organization addresses these entry points.

Organizing by token category (colors, spacing, typography) creates a clear top-level structure. Within categories, subcategorization by use case (background colors, text colors, border colors) helps users narrow their search.

A parallel organization by component can complement category organization. A button documentation page might link to all tokens relevant to buttons, providing a focused view for component work.

Cross-referencing between organization schemes helps users find tokens from multiple angles. A color token page links to components using that color. A component page links to its constituent tokens. This interconnection supports varied navigation patterns.

Should documentation include do and do-not examples?

Do and do-not examples provide valuable guidance when token selection involves judgment. They illustrate not just what is correct but what to avoid and why.

Effective do-not examples address actual misuse patterns observed in the codebase. If developers frequently use primitive colors instead of semantic tokens, an example showing this antipattern with explanation of the consequences helps correct the behavior.

Do examples should demonstrate recommended usage in realistic contexts. Showing a token used correctly in a common component scenario is more helpful than showing it applied to artificial examples.

Balance is important. Every token does not need do-not examples. Focus on tokens where misuse is common or consequences are significant. Overloading documentation with warnings can obscure the positive guidance.

How can documentation stay current with token changes?

Documentation drift, where docs describe tokens that no longer exist or omit newly added tokens, undermines trust and utility. Automation provides the primary defense.

Generated documentation extracts token information directly from source files during build processes. Token names, values, types, and basic metadata update automatically. This eliminates manual synchronization for reference documentation.

Custom content like usage guidelines and examples requires manual maintenance. Establishing documentation updates as part of the token change workflow helps: token PRs should include corresponding documentation updates.

Documentation testing can verify that token references in examples actually exist. Build processes that fail when documentation references unknown tokens catch drift before publication.

Periodic documentation audits supplement automated approaches. Reviewing documentation against actual token usage reveals gaps where guidance is needed and obsolete content that should be removed.

Summary

Design token documentation enables successful token adoption by explaining what tokens exist, how to use them, and why certain choices are preferred. Effective documentation combines auto-generated reference material with hand-crafted usage guidance and visual examples. Keeping documentation current through automation and process discipline ensures it remains a trusted resource as the token system evolves.

Buoy scans your codebase for design system inconsistencies before they ship

Detect Design Drift Free
← Back to Token Management