Design System Problems

Component Rename Tooling

January 15, 2026 • 5 min read

Component Rename Tooling

Component rename tooling automates updating references when design system component names change. Renaming affects imports, JSX usage, documentation references, and potentially styling selectors. Tooling handles these updates across codebases more reliably than manual find-and-replace.

What Is Component Rename Tooling

Rename tooling encompasses tools that update code when component identifiers change. When a Button component becomes ActionButton, all imports and usages need updating. Rename tooling identifies these references and transforms them to new names. Tooling operates at syntax level to handle variations correctly.

Renaming is common during design system evolution. Naming conventions may standardize. Clarity improvements may motivate renames. Component consolidation may unify names. Rename tooling makes these changes manageable across large consumer bases.

How Component Rename Tooling Works

Reference identification finds all component usages. Import statements bring components into files. JSX elements use component names. Type annotations reference component types. Documentation mentions component names. Comprehensive identification ensures nothing is missed.

Syntax-aware transformation handles code structure. Simple text replacement might change “Button” in unrelated contexts. Syntax-aware tools understand that Button in an import differs from “Button” in a string differs from button as a prop value. AST-based transformation applies changes precisely.

Multi-file coordination updates entire codebases. Rename tools traverse directories, process multiple files, and coordinate changes. Batch processing handles large codebases efficiently.

IDE integration provides interactive rename support. IDE rename features (like VS Code’s rename symbol) understand code structure and update references within scope. IDE tools work well for single-codebase renames.

Codemod implementation creates reusable transformations. jscodeshift or similar tools enable writing codemods that design system teams distribute. Consumers run codemods to apply renames. Codemods handle variations across different consumer codebases.

Key Considerations

Common Questions

How should design systems communicate upcoming renames?

Communication enables consumer preparation. Deprecation warnings in current versions alert developers to upcoming changes. Release notes announce renames with migration paths. Migration guides explain how to update code. Codemods provide automated transformation support. Timeline communication gives consumers adequate preparation time. Proactive communication reduces surprise and enables planned migration.

What challenges affect component rename tooling?

Several challenges complicate rename tooling. Dynamic imports using string concatenation resist static analysis. CSS class selectors matching component names need separate handling. Test snapshots containing component names need regeneration. Documentation source files need updating. Type definitions may need coordinated updates. Third-party integrations referencing components may need notification. Comprehensive rename requires addressing these varied reference types beyond just source code.

Summary

Component rename tooling automates reference updates through identification of all usages, syntax-aware transformation handling code structure correctly, multi-file coordination for complete codebase updates, IDE integration for interactive renames, and codemod implementation for distributable transformations. Communication of upcoming renames through deprecation warnings, migration guides, and codemods enables consumer preparation. Challenges include dynamic imports, CSS selectors, test snapshots, and documentation requiring comprehensive handling.

Buoy scans your codebase for design system inconsistencies before they ship

Detect Design Drift Free
← Back to Component Drift